Case Number REFERENCE NO. 35 OF 2023
Summary

The Applicant alleges that the Respondent’s State action of its Judiciary to sustain the death penalty does not conform with the Constitution of South Sudan and therefore violates Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the East African Treaty. The Applicant further alleges that the action of the Respondents judiciary amounts to discrimination as the killer of his brother was acquitted of murder charges and there is a violation of the rule of law and an infringement of Article 6(d) and 7(2) of the East African EAC Treaty.

RespondentTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN
ComplainantAKUEI TIAR GHAI
Date filedSeptember 28, 2023
CountriesSouth Sudan
Keyword
Treaty ArticleArticle 6 , Article 7

First Instance Judgment

Verdict
PDF document
Date delivered
Quorum

Appeal Judgment

Verdict
PDF document
Date delivered
Quorum