Case Number REFERENCE NO. 5 OF 2011
Summary

The case concerns the denial of entry to Uganda for a member of a delegation from a non-governmental organisation, subsequent detention and deportation, and the question whether this was lawful.

RespondentThe Attorney General of the Republic of Uganda
ComplainantSamuel Mukira Muhochi
Date filedJune 13, 2011
CountriesUganda
KeywordArrest & Detention
Treaty ArticleArticle 104 , Article 27 , Article 30 , Article 38 , Article 6 , Article 7 , Article 7 , Rule 1 , Rule 24

First Instance Judgment

Verdict
i) The Reference is properly the Court.
ii) The Sovereignty of the Republic of Uganda to deny entry to unwanted persons who are citizens of the Partner States is not taken away by the Treaty and the Protocol but, in denying entry to such persons, the Republic of Uganda is legally bound to ensure compliance with the requirements of the relevant provisions of the Treaty and the Protocol. Sovereignty cannot act as a defence or justification for non compliance, and neither can it be a restraint or impediment to compliance.
iii) The denial of entry into Uganda of the Applicant, a citizen of a Partner State, without according him the due process of law was illegal, unlawful and a breach of Uganda’s obligations under Articles 6(d) and 7 (2) of the Treaty.
iv) The actions of denial of entry, detention, removal and return of the Applicant, a citizen of a Partner State, to the Republic of Kenya, a Partner State, were illegal, unlawful and in violation of his rights under Articles 104 of the Treaty and 7 of the Common Market Protocol.
v) On matters pertaining to citizens of the Partner States, any provisions of Section 52 of Uganda’s Citizenship and Immigration Control Act formerly inconsistent with provisions of the Treaty and the Protocol were rendered inoperative and have no force of law, as of the respective dates of entry into force of the Treaty and the Protocol as law applicable in the Republic of Uganda.
vi) Each party shall bear its costs.
PDF documentDownload the decision as PDF
Date deliveredMay 17, 2013
Quorum

Appeal Judgment

Verdict
PDF document
Date delivered
Quorum