The Applicant alleges that the judgment rendered by the Respondent’s Supreme Court on May 23, 2025, in Petition No. E043 of 2024, which sanitized a long-standing disobedience of a court decree regarding unpaid legal fees and a mandatory interlocutory injunction are unlawful Infringements on Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicant alleges that the judgment rendered by the Respondent’s Supreme Court on May 23, 2025, in Petition No. E025 of 2024 (consolidated with Petition No. E026 of 2024), which arbitrarily revoked a confirmed grant of letters of administration and dismissed the Applicant’s appeal regarding the estate of Laban Kiplagat Kiptui are unlawful Infringements on Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicant alleges that the Respondents’ failure to ensure the mandatory integration of East African Community (EAC) Law within the Ugandan legal curricula across the eighteen (18) accredited law Universities are unlawful Infringements on Articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 76, and 126 of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicant alleges that the Respondent’s actions through the High Court at Kisii of unlawfully rendering a decision in consolidated Petition No. 6 of 2022 and Petition No. 1 of 2022, which dismissed claims for compensation and resettlement of integrated IDPs are unlawful infringements on Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicants allege that the Respondent’s actions on May 18 and 19, 2025 of interception, detention at airport facilities, confiscation of travel documents, and denial of entry into the United Republic of Tanzania to prevent attendance at a trial are unlawful Infringements on the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community and the EAC Common Market Protocol as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicant alleges that the judgement made by the Respondent’s Supreme Court in petition E036 of 2024 between Justus Gituma Miguna and Muhu Holdings CO. LTD, which sanitized an unlawful eviction from Plot No. 209/681/2 despite the property not being subject to the original litigation are unlawful infringements on Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicant contends that the Environmental Restoration Orders issued by the National Environment Management Authority on 11 April 2025, requiring it to vacate its lawfully owned property without prior, fair, and prompt compensation are unlawful infringements on Articles 6(d), 7(2), and 8(4) of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicants allege that the Respondent’s actions on 10 March 2025 of demolishing residences via the National Environment Management Authority, the Uganda Police Force, and the Uganda People’s Defence Forces, without prior, fair, and adequate compensation, are unlawful infringements on Articles 6(d), 7(2), and 8(4) of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicants contend that the Respondent State’s acts and omissions resulting in widespread attacks, killings, persecution, displacement, and discrimination against the Banyamulenge, Hema, and Tutsi communities in North Kivu, South Kivu, and Ituri are unlawful infringements on Articles 5, 6(d), 7(2), and 8(4) of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community, as well as provisions of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the Protocol to the African Charter on the Rights of Women in Africa, and the Great Lakes Pact and its Protocols.

The Applicants, South Sudan Supreme Airlines Co. Ltd and Pan African Law Chambers, LLP, allege that the Respondent, through the Ministry of Finance and Planning, entered into a binding settlement agreement acknowledging a debt of USD 1,053,936,749.853. The agreement required payment in 24 equal monthly instalments beginning 28th February 2025, with a 10% advocate’s fee payable directly to the second Applicant. Despite repeated demands, the Respondent failed to honour any payments. The Applicants contend that this failure breaches articles 5, 6(d), 7(2) and 8(1)(c) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.