The Applicant alleges that the actions of the Respondent State by the Supreme Court erroneously analyzing and refusing to remain consistent with the duties that had been recommended by the judge of cessation and rendering a decision of convenience under RTC 2003 in a land dispute between himself and another party in disregard of the laws of the Respondent State are in violation and contrary to the fundamental principles of good governance, human rights, rule of law and social justice as provided for in the treaty for the establishment of the East African Community as envisaged in articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the treaty.

The Applicant alleges that the actions by the government of the Respondent State neglecting to pay its claims for work done out of a contract for construction of a Prison General Headquarters Building in Juba and instead illegally terminating its contract was a violation of the fundamental principles of rule of law and good governance as set out in Articles 6(d) &7(2) of the Treaty for The Establishment of The East African Community.

The Applicant alleges that the act of the Respondent State through the Rwanda Utilities and Regulatory Authority replacing/demoting her verbally from the position as a Senior Manager in charge of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation without cause and grounds for the same contravene the principles of good governance, rule of law and democracy and as such infringe on articles 6(d), 7(2) and 8(1) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.

The Applicants allege that the actions of Her Excellency Samia Suluhu Hassan The President of the Respondent State through the Government Notice No. 64 of 2022 published on 14th October 2022 which alienates 1502 km2 of land from both the districts of Ngorongoro and Serengeti as Pololeti Game Reserve was illegal, unprocedural and done without consultations. They further aver that the said actions violate the principles of democracy, rule of law and good governance as such infringe on Articles 6(d),7(2) and 8(1) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.

The Applicant alleges that the election of the Respondent’s State Representatives to the East African Legislative Assembly held on 29th September 2022 was unprocedural, predetermined and shambolic. The applicant also faults the Ugandan Parliamentary Rules of Procedure in the election of the Ugandan Representatives to EALA stating that is ambiguous and vague on the manner of actual tallying, verification, and announcements of results of the elections. She asserts that the election was in contravention to Articles 6(d), 7(2) and 50 of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.

The Applicants filed the reference on basis of Articles 6c,6d,7(2),8(1),111 &112 and alleges that the construction of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP) from the oil fields in Uganda to the port of Tanga in Tanzania along the Indian Ocean will cause grave environmental, social and economic injustices to the communities in the countries along the path of the pipeline in contravention of the aforementioned articles of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.

The Applicant alleges that the Respondent’s State action by its Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission of Kenya (IEBC) of conducting the presidential elections and declaring the winner in violation of the of the Constitution and laws of Kenya and the act of the Respondent’s State Supreme Court presidential dispute resolution process failing to properly adjudicate resultant dispute in accordance with the Constitution and laws of Kenya as well as applicable AU Treaty Law, International Law, the principles governing elections and electoral dispute resolution were all violations of Article 6(d), 7(1)(b) and 8(1)(c) of the EAC Treaty.

The Applicant alleges that, the Judgement rendered by the Court of Appeal against the claimant herein on the 21st October 2022 in Nairobi Court of Appeal Civil Appeal No. 174 of 2017, the adverse Ruling rendered against the Claimant herein by Hon. Justice Mwera on the 24th February 2011 in NAIROBI HCCC NO. 599 OF 201, The Adverse ruling rendered by the Court of Appeal against the Claimant herein on the 3rd October 2014 in Court of Appeal Application No. NAI. 47 OF 2011 and the Adverse Ruling delivered by the Supreme Court of Kenya against the Claimant herein on the 26th January 2017 in Supreme Court Petition of Appeal No. 33 of 2014 whose net sum negative effects was to Approve, Sanction and sanitize the unlawful distress and Auction of the Claimants Law Firm by The Coffee Board of Kenya (A GOVERNMENT PARASTATAL), The Law Firm of Rachier and Amollo Advocates and their Agents on LR. No. 209/6545 within Nairobi are in contravention of Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the East African Treaty, Articles 10,19,20,21,25,27,28,29,33,40,48,50 and 159 the Constitution of Kenya 2010, and Articles 16,17,18,19,20,21,22 and 23 of The United Nations Principles on the Role of Lawyers.

The Applicant alleges that the actions and omissions of the Respondent of unlawfully and unreasonably locking him out of interviews held in August 2022 for the position of Senior Public Relations Officer of the East African Legislative Assembly amount to violations of Articles 6(d), 7(1)(b) and 8(1)(c) of the Treaty of the Establishment of East African Community and also Regulation 20(6) of the EAC Staff Rules and Regulations, 2006.

The Applicant alleges that, all the provisions of the Computer Misuse (Amendment) Act, 2022, passed by the Parliament of the Respondent’s State on 9 September 2022 or thereabouts and signed into law by Ugandan President on 13 October 2022 or thereabouts, are infringement of Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of Treaty for the Establishment of East African Community.