The Applicant alleges that the Respondent’s actions through the High Court at Kisii of unlawfully rendering a decision in consolidated Petition No. 6 of 2022 and Petition No. 1 of 2022, which dismissed claims for compensation and resettlement of integrated IDPs are unlawful infringements on Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicants allege that the Respondent’s actions on May 18 and 19, 2025 of interception, detention at airport facilities, confiscation of travel documents, and denial of entry into the United Republic of Tanzania to prevent attendance at a trial are unlawful Infringements on the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community and the EAC Common Market Protocol as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicant alleges that the judgement made by the Respondent’s Supreme Court in petition E036 of 2024 between Justus Gituma Miguna and Muhu Holdings CO. LTD, which sanitized an unlawful eviction from Plot No. 209/681/2 despite the property not being subject to the original litigation are unlawful infringements on Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicant contends that the Environmental Restoration Orders issued by the National Environment Management Authority on 11 April 2025, requiring it to vacate its lawfully owned property without prior, fair, and prompt compensation are unlawful infringements on Articles 6(d), 7(2), and 8(4) of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicants allege that the Respondent’s actions on 10 March 2025 of demolishing residences via the National Environment Management Authority, the Uganda Police Force, and the Uganda People’s Defence Forces, without prior, fair, and adequate compensation, are unlawful infringements on Articles 6(d), 7(2), and 8(4) of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community as well as the Fundamental and operational Principles of the Community.

The Applicants contend that the Respondent State’s acts and omissions resulting in widespread attacks, killings, persecution, displacement, and discrimination against the Banyamulenge, Hema, and Tutsi communities in North Kivu, South Kivu, and Ituri are unlawful infringements on Articles 5, 6(d), 7(2), and 8(4) of The Treaty for Establishment of The East African Community, as well as provisions of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the Protocol to the African Charter on the Rights of Women in Africa, and the Great Lakes Pact and its Protocols.

The Applicants, South Sudan Supreme Airlines Co. Ltd and Pan African Law Chambers, LLP, allege that the Respondent, through the Ministry of Finance and Planning, entered into a binding settlement agreement acknowledging a debt of USD 1,053,936,749.853. The agreement required payment in 24 equal monthly instalments beginning 28th February 2025, with a 10% advocate’s fee payable directly to the second Applicant. Despite repeated demands, the Respondent failed to honour any payments. The Applicants contend that this failure breaches articles 5, 6(d), 7(2) and 8(1)(c) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.

The Applicant alleges that the Respondent’s State through its decision of High Court in Nairobi Misc. Application No. 883 of 2007 against the Applicant of unlawfully blocking the Applicant from executing a decree contravenes Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community, Article 16 of the United Nations Basic Principles on the role of Lawyers and the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct.

The Applicant alleges that the Respondents State through the decision and decree issued by the Supreme Court of Uganda in Constitutional Appeal No. 2 of 2021 between the Attorney General and the Hon. Michael Andrew Kabaziruka and in particular orders (2), (3), (4) and (5) of the decree fall short of the fundamental and operational principles of the Community by failing to explicitly abolish the practice of trying civilians in military courts regardless of the circumstances and also failing to apply retrospective annulment and therefore an infringement of Articles 6(d), 7(2) and 8(1) (c) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African.

The Applicant alleges that the Respondent’s State decision through the Environment and Land Court at Nakuru in Case Number ELCMISC/3/2020 where the Court held that there was no material placed before it to demonstrate that the Taxing Officer exercised her discretion injudiciously and therefore dismissing the application for not being merited was incompetent, biased and violated Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community.